Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Health promotion paper | Abc Paper
+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

Reduce the number of new HIV infections — HIV‑01.
Health Promotion Paper Rubric

 

Criteria Maximum # points: 100

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Content 

Introduction to the Health People 2030 Objective

15 points

15 points

Identifies the issue and why the Healthy People 2030 Objective is important to explore. Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction.
Issue or concern that triggered need for the Healthy People Objective 2030 covered in detail and supported by research.

12 points

Identifies the issue and why the Healthy People 2030 Objective is important to explore but lacking in depth or comp–Organization, transitions, introduction slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Issue or concern that triggered need for the Healthy People Objective 2030 addressed and supported by research but slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.

10-points

Minimal discussion of the issue and why the Healthy People 2030 objective is important to explore.
Organization, transitions, introduction are slightly inconsistent, lacking clarity.
Issue or concern that triggered need for the Healthy People Objective 2030 minimally addressed and/or minimally supported by research.

5 points

Minimal discussion of the issue and why the Healthy People 2030 objective is important to explore.
Organization, transitions,
introduction inconsistent and lacking significant amount clarity and/or appropriateness. Poor transitions, introduction
Issue or concern that triggered need for the Healthy People Objective 2030 not addressed or not supported by research.

Quality of Research/Review of Literature

30 points

30 points

Research evidenced-based and in depth and beyond the obvious revealing new insights and includes more than 5 scholarly journal articles /references

25 points

Research is evidenced based but reveals few new insights. And includes 5 scholarly journal articles/references

10 points. Majority of research is not evidenced based even if it includes 5 scholarly journal articles/references

5 points

Review of literature does not directly address research
topic. No depth or breadth to the review of literature. Less than 5 scholarly journal articles/references

Participants

15 points

15 points

Target group and rationale for selecting target group well-defined. Detailed discussion of how age/gender/cultural variables impact the presentation of the information and supported by research.

12 points

Target group and rationale for selecting target group well-defined. Discussion of how age/gender/cultural variables impact the presentation of the information supported by research but missing 1-2 key elements

10 points

Target group and rationale for selecting target group and discussion of how age/gender/cultural variables impact the presentation of the information supported by research but minimally defined.

5 points

Target group and rationale for selecting target group and discussion of how age/gender/cultural variables impact the presentation of the information either not included or not defined and/or not supported by research.

Objectives/Content/Materials/Evaluation

20 points 

20 points

Learning Objective, Content Outline, Strategies, materials, costs, and evaluation fully developed, and table included in the body of the paper. Includes more than 2 objectives stated in clear and measurable terms

15 points

Learning Objective, Content Outline, Strategies, materials costs, and evaluation fully developed but lacking insight. Table included in the body of the paper. Includes 2 objectives stated in clear and measurable terms

10 points

Learning Objective, Content Outline, Strategies, materials, costs, and evaluation minimally developed. Table included in the body of the paper. Includes 2 objectives instated in clear and measurable terms

5 points

Learning Objective, Content Outline, Strategies, materials, costs, and evaluation not developed and/or table not included in the body of the paper. Less than 2 objectives stated in clear and measurable terms

Publicity/Marketing

10 points

10 points

Marketing strategies well defined including who will assist in the marketing and supported by research.

8 points

Marketing strategies defined and includes who will assist in the marketing slightly inconsistent and lacking in clarity but supported by research.

6 points

Marketing strategies minimally defined with minimal discussion of who will assist in the marketing but supported by research.

2 points

Marketing strategies and who will assist in the marketing not defined and not supported by research.

Grammar/ Mechanics

5 points

5 points

Paper does not exceed more than 10 pages not including the title and references pages; more than a5 scholarly journal articles current within the past 3years; No errors in format or punctuation or capitalization. –Consistent and appropriate voice. — Sophisticated and precise word choice. Paragraph size appropriate –No spelling errors. No slang. –No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.

4 points

Paper does not exceed more than 10 pages not including the title and reference pages
4 or less errors in format, punctuation, or capitalization. — Voice mostly consistent and appropriate. Lengthy paragraphs — Fairly effective word choice. –No more than 2 spelling errors. –Fewer than 1 error in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense. —

3 points

Paper exceeds more than 10 pages not including the title and reference pages and/or
6 or less errors in format, punctuation, or capitalization. Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate. Lengthy paragraphs. More than 5 spelling errors. –More than 2 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.

0 points

Paper exceeds more than 10 pages not including the title and reference pages and /or
Many errors in format, punctuation, or capitalization.
Paper fails to flow in a logical sequence. Errors distract from readability.

References

5 points

5 points

Sources reliable and properly cited. More than 5 scholar evidenced based journal articles references. All references correctly cited in the paper and on the reference page. All information relevant to topic.

4 points

Sources reliable and properly cited with 5 scholarly evidenced based journal articles
All references correctly cited in the paper and the bibliography. Information relevant to topic.

3 points

Sources reliable and properly cited. 5 scholarly evidenced-based journal articles. Articles do not substantially support the topic. .

0 points

Secondhand sources or sources incorrectly cited.
Does not have a minimum of 5 scholarly evidenced-based journal articles /references.
Articles/references minimally support the topic.

error: Content is protected !!