Chat with us, powered by LiveChat PSY435 Grand Canyon Collaborative Learning Community Written Assignment | Abc Paper
+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

1)Separate the 40 participants listed below into two groups of 20, in which each group has an equal number of men and women (10 M, 10 F each). Use a random numbers table (text, pp. 537-538) to accomplish this. (Start anywhere in the table, and proceed in any direction that you like. Odd numbers put the subjects in group 1; even numbers in group 2. When one group is filled, the rest go into the other group.)2)Next, separate the participants into two groups by using range matching (decide on your acceptable ranges in advance, for example, within 5 pounds). a)Match as many pairs of female participants as possible: find a match and randomly assign one to the first group, and the other to the second group. Next, do the same for the male participants.b)Next, match not only on gender, but also on weight.c)Finally, match the participants on all three variables.3)Finally, match the 40 participants on gender, weight, and height, using rank-ordered matching.40 Participants to be matched:NameGenderWeight (lbs.)Height (in.)#1. Anna BoFannaF110602. Sandy BeachF140703. Chuck WagonM200724. Ken GarooM180705. Seymour ClearlyM190716. Phil O’DendronM210747. Rhoda DendronF120658. Pete MossM150689. Howie DooitM1607010. Willy MakeitM1807011. Betty Won’tF1006312. Al GebraM1907213. Carol OfthebellsF955514. Harold BethynameM2407615. Andy WalkswithmeM2507516. Rod AndreelM2207217. Stu PottsM1906918. Sharon SometimetogetherF1086519. Clara AsabellF1156820. Allyson WonderlandF1186821. April ShowersF1106322. Ben DoverM1906923. Hugh GottabekiddinmeM2007224. May FlowersF1307025. June BlossomsF1006026. Helen HighwaterF1356827. Sam IamM1956928. Mike RobiologyM2157229. Maye BeesoF1346730. Polly Warner-CrackerF1095431. Rick O’ChetM1406432. Bill BoardM1807033. I. C. FreezeM1907134. Barry UmM2007235. Raye DiumF1126736. Helena BaskitF1146637. Summer RayneF966538. Deniece DenephewF1226939. Goldie LoxF1056340. Cindy RellaF12468This is a Collaborative Learning Community assignment.Review the “Matched-Subjects Design” document, found under course materials tab, and follow the instructions listed in the document.Working with your group members complete the design experiment.After completing the exercise, have a scholarly discussion around the following questions in your CLC thread:1.Advantages for each technique. Provide at least two.2.Disadvantages for each technique. Provide at least two.3.Discuss the criteria used to determine the appropriateness of random assignment versus matching techniques.As a group, come to a consensus for each question. Choose a recorder to record your consensus in a word document to be submitted to your instructor. You will not need to prepare an APA style paper, you may use bullet points to convey your consensus; however strong academic writing is still expected, as well as in-text citations where appropriate.Submit your individual “Matched-Subjects Design” document, the recorder will submit the consensus paper along with their “Matched-Subjects Design” document. See the resources titled “Submitting Multiple Assignment Documents” for assistance.
psy_452matchedsubjectsdesignassignmentdirections.docx

psy_435_random_numbers.docx

Unformatted Attachment Preview

PSY-452-Experimental Psychology
Matched-Subjects Design
1) Separate the 40 participants listed below into two groups of 20, in which each group has
an equal number of men and women (10 M, 10 F each). Use a random numbers table
(text, pp. 537-538) to accomplish this. (Start anywhere in the table, and proceed in any
direction that you like. Odd numbers put the subjects in group 1; even numbers in group
2. When one group is filled, the rest go into the other group.)
2) Next, separate the participants into two groups by using range matching (decide on your
acceptable ranges in advance, for example, within 5 pounds).
a) Match as many pairs of female participants as possible: find a match and randomly
assign one to the first group, and the other to the second group. Next, do the same for
the male participants.
b) Next, match not only on gender, but also on weight.
c) Finally, match the participants on all three variables.
3) Finally, match the 40 participants on gender, weight, and height, using rank-ordered
matching.
© 2015. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
40 Participants to be matched:
Name
#1. Anna BoFanna
2. Sandy Beach
3. Chuck Wagon
4. Ken Garoo
5. Seymour Clearly
6. Phil O’Dendron
7. Rhoda Dendron
8. Pete Moss
9. Howie Dooit
10. Willy Makeit
11. Betty Won’t
12. Al Gebra
13. Carol Ofthebells
14. Harold Bethyname
15. Andy Walkswithme
16. Rod Andreel
17. Stu Potts
18. Sharon Sometimetogether
19. Clara Asabell
20. Allyson Wonderland
21. April Showers
22. Ben Dover
23. Hugh Gottabekiddinme
24. May Flowers
25. June Blossoms
26. Helen Highwater
27. Sam Iam
28. Mike Robiology
29. Maye Beeso
30. Polly Warner-Cracker
31. Rick O’Chet
32. Bill Board
33. I. C. Freeze
34. Barry Um
35. Raye Dium
36. Helena Baskit
37. Summer Rayne
38. Deniece Denephew
39. Goldie Lox
40. Cindy Rella
Gender
F
F
M
M
M
M
F
M
M
M
F
M
F
M
M
M
M
F
F
F
F
M
M
F
F
F
M
M
F
F
M
M
M
M
F
F
F
F
F
F
Weight (lbs.)
110
140
200
180
190
210
120
150
160
180
100
190
95
240
250
220
190
108
115
118
110
190
200
130
100
135
195
215
134
109
140
180
190
200
112
114
96
122
105
124
Height (in.)
60
70
72
70
71
74
65
68
70
70
63
72
55
76
75
72
69
65
68
68
63
69
72
70
60
68
69
72
67
54
64
70
71
72
67
66
65
69
63
68
This is a Collaborative Learning Community assignment.
Review the “Matched-Subjects Design” document, found under course materials tab, and follow
the instructions listed in the document.
Working with your group members complete the design experiment.
After completing the exercise, have a scholarly discussion around the following questions in your
CLC thread:
1.Advantages for each technique. Provide at least two.
2.Disadvantages for each technique. Provide at least two.
3.Discuss the criteria used to determine the appropriateness of random assignment versus
matching techniques.
As a group, come to a consensus for each question. Choose a recorder to record your consensus in
a word document to be submitted to your instructor. You will not need to prepare an APA style
paper, you may use bullet points to convey your consensus; however strong academic writing is
still expected, as well as in-text citations where appropriate.
Submit your individual “Matched-Subjects Design” document, the recorder will submit the
consensus paper along with their “Matched-Subjects Design” document. See the resources titled
“Submitting Multiple Assignment Documents” for assistance.

Our essay writing service fulfills every request with the highest level of urgency.
attachment

error: Content is protected !!