Chat with us, powered by LiveChat PNG200 WVU Petroleum Industry Risk Analysis And Operational Safety | Abc Paper
+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

15 pages. talk about safety regulations in petroleum industry. should have graphs and tables. proved a section discussing deep water horizon and the safety issues faced during that event.
png200.pdf

Unformatted Attachment Preview

SAMPLE RUBRIC FOR
GRADING A RESEARCH PAPER
(Identify the points you want to add to each category)
Outstanding
Good
Fair
Unacceptable
Visual
Presentation
Cover page with relevant info,
including descriptive title.
Section headings.
Good graphics, with appropriate
citations.
Clean and professional looking.
Cover page.
Sections headings.
Graphics included.
Professional looking.
Most relevant information present.
Some section headings, captions, or
graphics used.
Looks like H.S. paper.
Relevant information is
missing.
Missing titles, captions,
headings, name of author.
Not professional.
Abstract
Abstract is proper length.
Highly informative, complete and
easy to understand.
Appropriate vocabulary is used.
Abstract makes you want to read
the paper.
Abstract is proper
length.
Informative, complete
and understandable.
Appropriate vocabulary
is used.
Abstract is proper
length.
Somewhat informative
and understandable.
Abstract is not the proper
length.
Not very informative or
understandable.
Structure
Thesis is clear, easy to find, and
appropriate to the assignment.
Thesis is supported by the rest of
the paper.
Paper contains a “roadmap” for
the reader.
There is a logical flow to the
topics/arguments.
Conclusion follows clearly from
the arguments presented.
Thesis is clear and appropriate.
Thesis fairly well supported.
Paper is fairly well organized.
Conclusion follows from
the rest of the paper.
Thesis is fairly clear.
Inconsistent support
for thesis.
Paper weakly organized.
Conclusion is acceptable.
Thesis unclear and/or
inappropriate.
Thesis not supported.
Paper is not organized.
Conclusion doesn’t follow
from the rest of the paper.
Research
The evidence comes from a wide
variety of valid sources.
The bibliography is complete and
reflects appropriate sources.
The evidence used reflects multiple views.
The evidence comes
from valid sources.
The bibliography is
complete.
The evidence used reflects multiple views.
Valid sources are inconsistently used.
The bibliography is
missing some pieces.
The evidence seldom
comes from valid sources.
The bibliography is missing significant information.
Thinking
Arguments are pertinent to the
topic.
Arguments are logical, supported
with evidence.
The key arguments have been
made – no major points have
been left out.
Arguments are pertinent
to the topic.
Arguments are fairly
logical and reasonably
supported.
Most key arguments
have been made.
Arguments are not
consistently pertinent,
logical, or supported.
Few key arguments
have been made.
Arguments not pertinent.
Arguments rarely, if at all,
logical and supported.
Almost no key arguments
have been made.
Interest Factor
Language and style appropriate
for intended audience.
Paper presents well-developed
analysis and synthesis.
There is nuance, inference and
subtlety to the paper.
Main points are memorable.
Reader is very engaged.
Language and style
appropriate.
Paper presents reasonable analysis and
synthesis.
There is a little nuance,
inference and subtlety.
Main points clear.
Reader is engaged.
Language and style
only fair.
Less-developed analysis and synthesis.
Nuance, inference and
subtlety lacking.
Main points present,
not well made.
Language and style poor.
Analysis and synthesis
lacking.
Main points not discernable.
|
PO Box 6800
|
150 Clay Street, 3rd Floor
|
Morgantown, WV 26506-6800
West Virginia University is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer – Minority/Female/Disability/Veteran.
|
online.wvu.edu

Our essay writing service fulfills every request with the highest level of urgency.
attachment

error: Content is protected !!